Maryland weighs DDA cuts amid deficit

Maryland’s latest budget debate is raising familiar concerns for stakeholders in intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) services. State discussions around the Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) are again centering on how quickly fiscal pressure can place essential supports at risk for individuals with disabilities.

State officials have advanced proposals that would reduce approximately $150 million in DDA funding. The reductions are framed as part of the governor’s broader effort to close a projected budget deficit.

Proposed reductions focus on self-directed supports

The current package includes changes tied to self-directed services. Proposed adjustments would affect reimbursement rates, and the state is also considering caps on how much individuals can claim. State officials say the measures are intended to help balance the budget. The proposals have drawn close attention because self-directed service models often rely on flexible reimbursement structures. Any adjustment in rates or claim limits can shift how individuals plan and use their authorized supports.

Advocates flag risks to access and staffing

Disability advocates, councils, and family groups are warning that the proposed reductions could affect access to critical supports for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Their concerns include a reduced ability to hire caregivers and tighter limits on self-directed services. Advocates also argue that reductions could undermine progress connected to community living and employment opportunities. They have emphasized that changes in funding or benefit limits can ripple across supports that families and providers depend on to sustain services.

Past budget cycles shape today’s response

DDA funding disputes are not new in Maryland. In prior budget cycles, proposals to cut hundreds of millions of dollars from the agency prompted rallies and intensive advocacy. Those efforts ultimately led to legislators restoring much of the funding. In the current round, lawmakers and the governor’s office have indicated a willingness to negotiate adjustments. Even so, advocates remain concerned that any reduction in funding or new benefit limits could add strain to families and providers who rely on these supports.